Gamalyze — Charla general

Good morning, I would say that I compare it to slots, playing by chance, typical for many players, does not belong to my style of play, very reasoned and prudent!!

Buongiorno,direi che lo paragono alle slots,giocare a fortuna,tipico da moltissimi giocatori ,non mi appartiene nel mio stile di gioco,molto ragionato e prudente !!

And what slots are in your style? What doesn't suit you about this one?😀

gipsylay428@gmail.com

Hi, it's a useless test, as far as I'm concerned, it's playing in the dark, what do you want a player to do without any reference, randomly turn the cards for what? I recommend instead publishing a casino game, with a stake of like 2000 chips, and seeing who can earn without going to zero!! This is a tool to understand who is a moderate player, or a compulsive player, addicted to gambling!!

Ciao,è un test che non serve a niente, per come la penso io,è giocare al buio,cosa vuoi che faccia un giocatore senza nessun riferimento,gira a caso le carte per cosa?Consiglio invece di pubblicare un gioco di casinò,con una posta di gioco,tipo 2000 fiches,e vedere chi riesce a guadagnare senza andare a zero !!Questo è uno strumento per capire chi è un giocatore moderato,oppure un giocatore convulso,malato di gioco !!

2000

This is really a great game, you can win a lot, it is definitely recommended to everyone

Das ist echt ein super spiel man kann dabei sehr viel absahnen es ist aufjedenfall jeden zu empfehlen

It is a game that is part of "safer gambling week" players have the opportunity to try and find out what type of player they are, so if you find this test useless, that's fine. I have seen many players who are of the opposite opinion and enjoy something like this. Views can differ and if you know yourself and your playstyle then it's probably ok if you don't need to know again.🙂

Is that the score you ended up with? Did you learn anything useful?🙂

Hi, what did you manage to upload when you turned over all the cards?😀

Hi all,

We are running this game as a way to educate about the risks of gambling and foster safer behaviour.

The game analyses your behaviour based on your reaction to losses and wins and your focus on either of the packs, as they are different and offer different potential gains and losses. There is another thread for this game: https://casino.guru/forum/responsible-gambling/play-free-simple-card-game-to-test-your-gambling-style.

Your goal is to end the game with as much money as possible. Similarly as when you risk your own money. Based on how much you end up with will tell you how good you were compared with others.

What I find more interesting is the following page, which will tell you more about your gambling style. Like it or not, gambling activates processes in your brain that influence your "logical" thinking. You deal with impulses thanks to the reward system (release of dopamine) in your brain. It makes people follow particular behaviour patterns. If you become aware of these patterns, it is easier to control your behaviour, thus decreasing the negative impact of gambling.

I hope you will enjoy it.

Hi, this is my thought, which I find very useful in this game: Randomness is, by its nature, unpredictable. No tool, algorithm or system can predict the outcomes of random events like those in games of chance. However, our mind is predisposed to look for patterns even when there are none, and this leads us to fall into the illusion that it is possible to "control" or "predict" randomness. Pareidolia is a powerful phenomenon, but in the context of gambling it does not offer us any real advantage. Rather, it serves as a tool to keep players trapped in the cycle of gambling, fueling false hopes and fostering an industry built on the illusion of control.

Therefore, being aware of pareidolia and its effect on gambling can help maintain a more rational and detached approach, avoiding falling into the trap of looking for patterns where they do not exist.

Ciao,questo è il mio pensiero,che ritengo molto utile in questo gioco : La casualità è, per sua natura, imprevedibile. Nessuno strumento, algoritmo o sistema può prevedere i risultati di eventi casuali come quelli dei giochi d’azzardo. Tuttavia, la nostra mente è predisposta a cercare schemi anche quando non ci sono, e questo ci porta a cadere nell’illusione che sia possibile "controllare" o "prevedere" la casualità. La pareidolia è un fenomeno potente, ma nel contesto dei giochi d’azzardo non ci offre alcun vantaggio reale. Piuttosto, serve come strumento per mantenere i giocatori intrappolati nel ciclo del gioco, alimentando false speranze e favorendo un’industria costruita sull’illusione del controllo.

Essere quindi consapevoli della pareidolia e del suo effetto nel gioco d’azzardo può aiutare a mantenere un approccio più razionale e distaccato, evitando di cadere nella trappola di cercare schemi dove non esistono.

Thank you for this expertise. We appreciate it.

Did you try the game yourself here?

Hi, yes I tried it several times, with scores varying from 2850 to 3270, scores made with the logic of the cautious player. This does not mean that I was good or lucky, but I follow the thinking of the AI intelligence, created by man!!

Ciao,si lo provato varie volte, con punteggi variabili da 2850 a 3270,punteggi fatti con la logica del giocatore prudente . Questo non vuol dire che sono stato bravo oppure fortunato,ma seguo il pensiero dell'intelligenza IA,creata dall'uomo !!

That's a meaningful observation, and the (so-called) gamblers fallacy has been affecting the stimulus to gamble from its inception. Feeling that after three reds in a roulette, it must come black has made countless people lose when they felt so assured.

Even though the game's outcome is random, the number of different possible outcomes is limited. For example, there are three possible outcomes for colour in roulette (red, black, zero). This principle applies to most games and is vital for the long-term profitability of the house (casino, bookie, etc.)

Gamalyze is structured similarly, with the distinction that each deck has a (slightly) different set of outcomes. One gives slightly higher wins but has a chance for a significant loss; the other might be more conservative, with smaller wins and smaller losses. The reactions to the outcomes (losses and wins) and changes in decks choosing are the baseline of this risk calculation.

It is not perfect, and the perception of results can be subjective. It is also challenging to eliminate the bias when playing the game, especially if you are playing it multiple times. At the end of the day, the intention is to consider how you gamble to enhance control in the future.

Hi, yes I tried it several times, with scores varying from2000 to , scores2280 made with the logic of the cautious player. I was good or lucky,

Hi, yes I tried it several times, with scores varying from 2280I was good or lucky,

Hello my friends and the best bunch of people I talk to, yes I try this game I played it twice it's like any other slots it got me up there and the last 5 hits it brought me down that's why when you play a slot game it gets you up then it bring you down,that why you got to get out when you hit big and move on to another game but people don't think like that they think it's gonna hit them big "WRONG" lol MOVE ON TO ANOTHER GAME💯, 👀always try new games and when you hit good get out move on 😁 😜,and that's what I think is a good strategy.

It really is an interesting strategy.

Yes it is