Revisión Mandarin Palace Casino

Jugadores de Estados Unidos aceptados
8.5 Valoración
Perfecto
Reputación
Jugadores de Estados Unidos aceptados
Perfecto
Reputación
Esta reseña se actualizó por última vez: 2018-03-28T00:00Z  

La concienzuda reseña que hemos realizado de Mandarin Palace Casino ofrece una puntuación basada en las quejas y las condiciones del casino, así como en otras funcionalidades como los bonos o juegos. Mandarin Palace Casino es uno de los mejores casinos online que hemos reseñado hasta el momento y puedes tener la seguridad de que los depósitos que hagas estarán a salvo y no habrá retrasos ni problemas para retirar las posibles ganancias, independientemente del importe total. Lee nuestra reseña para consultar toda la información sobre la reputación del casino, el servicio de atención al cliente, los reintegros o los códigos de bono disponibles para Mandarin Palace Casino.

Residentes de
Estados Unidos
Aceptados
Dirección IP de
Estados Unidos
No bloqueada
Uso de
VPN
Permitido
Idioma del
sitio web
Inglés
Idioma del
chat en vivo
Inglés
Idioma de
atención al cliente por correo electrónico
Inglés
Sin bono de depósito
No disponible
Bono de Bienvenida* T&C apply
100% hasta 500 $
Métodos de pago
Proveedor de juegos
Dueño
Genesys Technology NV.
Establecido
2009
Límite de retirada
6.000 $  por mes
Autoridad licenciadora
Curaçao
Cuestionable
Positivos
  • Juegos únicos del proveedor de juegos Saucify
  • Buena reputación (solo algunas quejas no resueltas)
  • Acepta bitcoin
Negativos
  • Límite de reintegro muy bajo (6000 $ / mes)

Quejas sobre Mandarin Palace Casino y casinos relacionados (15)

Hemos realizado una amplia investigación en la red y hemos encontrado 15 quejas sobre Mandarin Palace Casino o cualquier marca relacionada. Teniendo en cuenta la gravedad y credibilidad de estas quejas y los ingresos estimados del casino, hemos decidido darle a Mandarin Palace Casino una reputación Perfecto.

Reputación de casino Perfecto
Quejas directas sobre el casino Mandarin Palace Casino
Caso poco claro, regulador pasivo
Puntos negros: 250
This particular case is strange as there is no evidence from any sides, therefore hard o decide.
The player complains he did not break any bonus rule. However, the casino's opinion is different. The casino says every no deposit bonus can be used just once per IP address. Somehow the casino offered the same bonus for the different casinos, the casino says the player used 3 times bonus for one IP address. The player reacts it was always for the different casino. It is hard to decide as there is no evidence and no such things in terms,
 
Esta queja es de 6/2013
Cantidad en disputa: 100 € (dinero de bono)
Leer más sobre: askgamblers.com
Leer más
Puntos negros: 0
This is usual case what the Americans may face when cashing out they checks.
Mary was not able to cash out the check she received. She was not following the instruction from the casino for withdrawing. Later they probably find another way to pay her, this is considered likely paid. The main problem is with US payments from casinos through the bank, this problem may occur.
 
Esta queja es de 7/2017
Cantidad en disputa: 880 $ (dinero real)
Leer más sobre: gamblinggrumbles.com
Leer más
Quejas relacionadas con Black Lotus Casino (Mismo dueño)
Caso poco claro, regulador pasivo
Puntos negros: 450
The player is waiting for his deposit to be returned to him.
The player, Amit, requested a withdrawal, sent all the documents in for verification and still didn't hear from the casino. When he contacted the casino he was informed that they found out he had a dispute with one of their sister casinos and can no longer play at their casino, which the player admitted. Later on, he decided that he wanted to close his account and the casino decided to credit his deposit money back into his card. He didn't receive the money yet.
 
Esta queja es de 8/2017
Cantidad en disputa: 900 $ (dinero real)
Leer más sobre: askgamblers.com
Leer más
Caso poco claro, regulador pasivo
Puntos negros: 250
Declined withdrawal and double account accusation.
After the player, Shorty035, requested a withdrawal and sent all the documents for a verification, the casino refused to pay the winnings to her due to a duplicate account accusation. She asked the casino to send or show her a proof, but they never did. She didn't receive any money.
 
Esta queja es de 5/2018
Cantidad en disputa: 400 $ (dinero real)
Leer más sobre: askgamblers.com
Leer más
Caso poco claro, regulador pasivo
Puntos negros: 250
Extremely long withdrawal process.
Tommy, a player from Belgium, requested a withdrawal, sent all the documents in for verification twice and still didn't receive his money. He contacted the chat where they informed him that the payment is pending but he should receive his money in the next 96 hours. He did not. About two weeks later he tried to use the chat, but they wouldn't answer him and he found a message there saying he should send them an email. So he did, twice, but didn't receive any reaction from the casino.
 
Esta queja es de 10/2017
Cantidad en disputa: 150 € (dinero real)
Leer más sobre: askgamblers.com
Leer más
Caso poco claro, regulador pasivo
Puntos negros: 250
Withdrawal process difficulties due to the player being from a restricted country.
The player, Salam from Bangladesh, requested a withdrawal payment and sent all the documents in for verification. The payment method he used didn't work for him so he asked the support to change it for him. They did, but the payment didn't process due to a country restriction. The finance support informed him that they sent him a check via courier but he never received it. When he updated the process to the finance team, he was informed they are still processing his payment and are looking for a way to deliver the payment to him and as soon as they will receive a confirmation number, they will inform him so he can track the payment. That also didn't happen and the player haven't received anything.
 
Esta queja es de 4/2015
Cantidad en disputa: 100 € (dinero real)
Leer más sobre: askgamblers.com
Leer más
Quejas relacionadas con Lotus Asia Casino (Mismo dueño)
Retraso en el pago, estado desconocido
Puntos negros: 186
Delayed payment. Problems with the payment method.
The player made a withdrawal request. They had no other choice but to use a check as a payment method. After receiving the check with a delay, the player tried to cash out in a bank. However, they were informed the check was fraudulent. The player contacted the casino and was promised they would receive the money on their Mastercard bank account but had to destroy the check first. After doing so, the casino tried to avoid contact with the player and the player kept waiting for the money. No update since then.
 
Esta queja es de 5/2015
Cantidad en disputa: 1.869 $ (dinero real)
Leer más sobre: askgamblers.com
Leer más
Quejas relacionadas con Bella Vegas Casino (Mismo dueño)
Caso poco claro, regulador pasivo
Puntos negros: 250
Player unable to withdraw winnings. Casino accused them of duplicate account and numerous bonus claims.
After depositing the player realised they made a mistake when typing their email address. They asked the casino's support for help and were promised that the representative of the casino would delete the old account. The player opened a new account, made a deposit and claimed bonus. After losing some money, they were able to win, the wagering requirements were fulfilled so they tried to withdraw the winnings. According to the player, the casino at first accused them of duplicate account (although they promised to delete the old account) and then of numerous bonus claims. The complaint remains unresolved. No update since then.
 
Esta queja es de 7/2014
Cantidad en disputa: 100 € (dinero de bono)
Leer más sobre: askgamblers.com
Leer más
Retraso en el pago, es probable que se haya abonado
Puntos negros: 100
La verificación de jugadores es extremadamente larga.
The player made a deposit and was double charged. The player was frustrated because they had to wait for a refund for several weeks. The casino stated all funds were paid back and the player was rewarded a special bonus for the trouble. No update since then.
 
Esta queja es de 3/2014
Cantidad en disputa: ?? (dinero real)
Leer más sobre: askgamblers.com
Leer más
Pecado del pasado
Puntos negros: 0
Player found in the statement section they had lost before ever playing the bonus.
Player found in the statement section they had lost before ever playing the bonus, probably due to a technical glitch. The casino promised to look into the matter. No update since then.
 
Esta queja es de 2/2013
Cantidad en disputa: ?? (dinero de bono)
Leer más sobre: askgamblers.com
Leer más
Quejas relacionadas con Planet Casino (Mismo dueño)
Caso poco claro, regulador pasivo
Puntos negros: 250
After he made winnings it turned out he was from country restricted to play.
Player is complaining that he kept receiving emails from casino inviting him to play and informing him about promotions etc, so the player started to play and made some winnings. However, when he wanted to withdraw he was informed that he couldn't because he was from a country restricted to play. The player doesn't understand why he was able to make a deposit and play if he was from country restricted. No reaction from the casino.
 
Esta queja es de 10/2017
Cantidad en disputa: 330 € (dinero real)
Leer más sobre: askgamblers.com
Leer más
Quejas relacionadas con Fone Casino (Mismo dueño)
El casino no aportó pruebas suficientes
Puntos negros: 500
Declined payment.
The customer had won at the casino using a bonus code and wanted to withdraw their winnings but the casino had declined this payment, stating that the customer had an account on the casino's sister site on which they had used a coupon already and that this breached their bonus terms. When asked to provide evidence of a breach of terms, the casino hadn't responded, thus this complaint is ruled for the customer.
 
Esta queja es de 8/2016
Cantidad en disputa: 150 € (dinero de bono)
Leer más sobre: askgamblers.com
Leer más
Quejas relacionadas con GrandBay Casino (Mismo dueño)
Caso poco claro, regulador pasivo
Puntos negros: 100
The player complains about the non-payment of money, but as she answered by the casino, she was inattentive, reading the bonus terms.
The player reading the bonus terms was inattentive and did not pay attention to the fact that the maximum withdrawal from the free money can reach only$ 150 Casino repeatedly tried to explain the answers, and the player had his own truth.
 
Esta queja es de 3/2013
Cantidad en disputa: ?? (dinero de bono)
Leer más sobre: askgamblers.com
Leer más
Caso poco claro, regulador pasivo
Puntos negros: 100
The casino first approved the withdrawal and then canceled it and allowed the player to withdraw only 150$.
The player wanted to withdraw his winnings, won with loyal points. The player wanted to withdraw his winnings, won with loyal points. At first, everything went well and the Finance Department approved the withdrawal. However, the winnings have not reached the player. When a player tried to withdraw money from his account again he was only able to withdraw 150$. The casino explained this by the fact that in the conditions it is written that the player cannot withdraw more than 150 if he won with loyal points. However, for us, it is still a mystery why the player was not explained for this immediately and why his winning was approved to withdraw first.
 
Esta queja es de 5/2016
Cantidad en disputa: 2.026 $ (dinero de bono)
Leer más sobre: askgamblers.com
Leer más
Quejas relacionadas con RoadHouse Reels Casino (Mismo dueño)
Sin reacción, regulador pasivo
Puntos negros: 480
The player's winnings were canceled due to the non-payment of the deposit, on that the player was not notified.
After the player made a deposit, he was credited with a bonus and he accordingly continued to play. After winning, he asked for withdrawing. However, the player saw that his winnings were canceled. He turned to live chat, where he was informed that his winnings were canceled due to non-payment of the deposit. Although from the beginning he did not report this.
 
Esta queja es de 10/2017
Cantidad en disputa: 1.600 $ (dinero de bono)
Leer más sobre: askgamblers.com
Leer más

¿Has encontrado una queja relevante sobre este casino o has tenido alguna experiencia personal negativa? Ayuda a otros jugadores y envía tu queja.

Ponga una queja
Solo listamos quejas donde el casino pueda estar rompiendo nuestro Código de apuesta justa.

Bonos Mandarin Palace Casino


4,25 de 5

1er Depósito

  • Depósito minimo: 20 $
  • Requerimientos de apuesta: Bono x40
  • Apuesta máxima: 8 $
  • Deberías obtener este bono de manera INSTANTANEA
  • Los jugadores de los siguientes países solo pueden jugar a tragamonedas cuando hayan pedido el bono: Reino Unido, Grecia, China, Japón, Singapur, Malasia, Colombia.

4,25 de 5

2do Depósito

  • Depósito minimo: 20 $
  • Requerimientos de apuesta: Bono x40
  • Apuesta máxima: 8 $
  • Deberías obtener este bono de manera INSTANTANEA
  • Los jugadores de los siguientes países solo pueden jugar a tragamonedas cuando hayan pedido el bono: Reino Unido, Grecia, China, Japón, Singapur, Malasia, Colombia.

4,25 de 5

3er Depósito

  • Depósito minimo: 20 $
  • Requerimientos de apuesta: Bono x40
  • Apuesta máxima: 8 $
  • Deberías obtener este bono de manera INSTANTANEA
  • Los jugadores de los siguientes países solo pueden jugar a tragamonedas cuando hayan pedido el bono: Reino Unido, Grecia, China, Japón, Singapur, Malasia, Colombia.

4,25 de 5

4to Depósito

  • Depósito minimo: 20 $
  • Requerimientos de apuesta: Bono x40
  • Apuesta máxima: 8 $
  • Deberías obtener este bono de manera INSTANTANEA
  • Los jugadores de los siguientes países solo pueden jugar a tragamonedas cuando hayan pedido el bono: Reino Unido, Grecia, China, Japón, Singapur, Malasia, Colombia.

Métodos de pago Mandarin Palace Casino

Juegos Mandarin Palace Casino

Tragamonedas
Ruleta
Vídeo Póker
Bingo
Blackjack
Baccarat
Dados
Keno
Tarjetas Rasca y Gana

Proveedores de Juegos Mandarin Palace Casino