Her review DID comply with your rules. Furthermore, it was correct and true and her genuine lived experience with Nanogames.io
If you don't think it was accurate or true, I suggest that you go to trust pilot and read other players experiences.
I have read it and it absolutely proved that they manipulated roulette. They admitted it AND paid that player money to keep quiet about it. That's enough proof for me
Exactly no review should have to be "evaluated".…..for what ? To see if you agree with it ? This is not right
Her review DID comply with your rules. Furthermore, it was correct and true and her genuine lived experience with Nanogames.io
If you don't think it was accurate or true, I suggest that you go to trust pilot and read other players experiences.
I'm just wondering why you need to create another account to address the same situation. It's not pretty honest, if you ask me. The same goes for the highly unproved yet very untruthful reviews you've posted on the Trust Pilot site. Two times, what a coincidence, right? We won't tolerate such an approach hence, I'm banning your account for trying to cause reputation damage.
If you can't play it fair, you are not welcome anymore.
Cursos educativos, profesionales y gratuitos para empleados de casinos online que tienen el objetivo de hacer un repaso de las buenas prácticas de la industria para mejorar la experiencia del jugador y ofrecer un enfoque justo de los juegos de azar.
Hemos puesto en marcha esta iniciativa con el objetivo de crear un sistema global de autoexclusión que permitirá que los jugadores vulnerables bloqueen su propio acceso a los sitios de juego online.
Una plataforma creada para mostrar el trabajo que llevamos a cabo para hacer realidad una industria del juego online más transparente y segura.
Un proyecto ambicioso cuyo objetivo es celebrar el trabajo de las empresas más responsables del mundo del iGaming y ofrecerles el reconocimiento que merecen.
