hace 3 meses
Digo como Leonardo en "El lobo de Wallstreet"
"¡No me voy a ir!" 🥳🥳🥳🤟
Traducción automática:
1
Question about Gambling websites with Curaçao license using incorrect Merchant Category code (página 132)
hace 3 meses
I uploaded the documents but they were removed!!
I haven’t been paid anything to silence people. I was passing on the message I received which clearly shows that this thread is illegal.
some of you claim to not care but I promise you will if they contact you directly.
hace 3 meses
Hej!
Digikey, Budapest = digikeyboard.com
Feastingmen.com/amegagame.com , both same company (you can find their mail on the websites) , thats all it says on my transactions🙂
1
Borrado
Publicado por Anonymized609 se ha borrado
hace 3 meses
I uploaded the documents but they were removed!!
I haven’t been paid anything to silence people. I was passing on the message I received which clearly shows that this thread is illegal.
some of you claim to not care but I promise you will if they contact you directly.
hace 3 meses
Qué es ilegal. ¿Puedes explicar? Tengo curiosidad y probablemente muchas más.
No existe ninguna ley que diga que no se pueden difamar a las empresas.
Lo único que podría haber sido ilegal aquí es si comenzamos a compartir nombres de personas que trabajan en empresas, etc. Hemos cuestionado su forma de procesar las transacciones. Estos métodos que utilizan están estrictamente prohibidos. Entonces, si ahora publicas algo sobre una empresa que lo hace como debe, por ejemplo Zimpler, Trustly y Open Banking, entonces es un asunto completamente diferente.
Traducción automática:
1
Borrado
Publicado por Bollee se ha borrado
hace 3 meses
Basically admitting on here to gambling but then claiming to not receive goods is an illegal offence. They are saying that we are capitalising on both playing with the funds and then getting money back. Also by us getting other people involved it makes it more serious as it’s a fraudulent scheme.
this is what they are telling me. I perfectly understand people wanting to keep their posts on here but it’s not worth it for me to do so receiving the threat.
hace 3 meses
Hello everyone,
I wanted to address the recent post claiming that a user received a legal threat from a individual user and suggesting that we remove our discussions about refund requests. While it’s important to take any potential legal matters seriously, there are a few points that need clarification:
- Lack of Evidence: The user has not provided any concrete evidence of the legal letter they claim to have received. Without seeing the actual document, it’s difficult to assess the validity of the claim.
- No Specifics Provided: The post mentions that what we are doing is "actually illegal" but does not specify what exact actions or discussions are considered illegal. For us to take appropriate steps, we need clear information on what legal grounds are being cited.
- Public Discussions and Consumer Rights: Discussing consumer experiences, including issues with payments and potential refunds, is a crucial aspect of consumer protection and transparency. We have the right to seek advice and share our experiences with these companies, especially if we believe there have been unethical practices.
3
Borrado
Publicado por carsix79 se ha borrado
hace 3 meses
I did post the email but it was removed!!!
hace 3 meses
Of course they do. People on here are contact Noda to try and get refunds from Santeda!! They shouldn’t be contacting Noda.
Borrado
Publicado por Dt100 se ha borrado
hace 3 meses
Sí, quienes hayan hecho esto serán acusados de fraude. Yo y la mayoría de este foro actuamos de acuerdo con la ley y anunciamos que
- el dinero fue al casino
- La manipulación del código de comerciante permitió el depósito, si el código de comerciante no hubiera sido manipulado, la transacción nunca habría ocurrido.
- La manipulación del código mercantil es contra la ley.
- Los códigos de MCC son parte de un sistema regulatorio que garantiza que las transacciones de pago se manejen de manera adecuada y ética. Usar el código incorrecto es un incumplimiento de contrato.
1. **Incumplimiento de contrato:** El uso del código MCC incorrecto puede resultar en incumplimiento de contrato con su procesador de pagos y compañías de tarjetas de crédito, lo que puede resultar en multas o incluso el cierre de la cuenta.
2. **Sanciones:** Las compañías de tarjetas de crédito y los procesadores de pagos pueden imponer una multa a los comerciantes que utilicen de manera fraudulenta el código MCC incorrecto.
3. **Pérdida de confianza:** El uso de un código incorrecto puede socavar la confianza entre el comerciante y su procesador de pagos.
En resumen, un comerciante no debe cambiar su código MCC por sí mismo, sino que debe trabajar con su procesador de pagos y con las compañías de tarjetas de crédito para asegurarse de que su negocio esté clasificado correctamente.
Traducción automática:
2
hace 3 meses
So just leave the thread if you are that bothered after receiving scaremongering contact.
You are now attempting to shut down a forum thread that has and is continuing to highlight the illegal/criminal tactics that these organised crime gangs behind these fake/scam websites are using.
I’m not surprised they are trying to get this thread removed as can’t believe it’s taken them so long. Clearly it’s now hitting them financially so they have to do something.
2
